Before discussing two proposed laws about end-of-life issues in France, the social affairs commission of the National Assembly held hearings with various associations. These hearings took place on a Tuesday evening, and the president of the commission, Frédéric Valletoux, limited each group to just five minutes to speak, despite their request for ten minutes. He argued that it was getting late and they needed to start the debate quickly.
During these hearings, different associations shared their views on end-of-life care, and it was clear that there were strong differences in their beliefs. For example, Dr. Olivier Trédan from Alliance VITA emphasized that the role of healthcare providers is to care for patients, not to assist them in dying. In contrast, Dr. Denis Labayle from the Association Le Choix spoke about helping people die in countries like Switzerland and Belgium, with little reaction from the audience.
Yoann Brossard from the Association for the Right to Die with Dignity argued that self-determination should guide lawmakers, but Véronique Bourgninaud from the Jérôme Lejeune Foundation countered that legislation should focus on real, living people rather than abstract ideas about freedom.
Some critics argue that the proposed laws manipulate language to avoid discussing the issue accurately. Dr. Claire Fourcade pointed out that the title of the law only mentions “end of life,” which could confuse people about whether they are legalizing euthanasia or just discussing end-of-life care. She raised important questions about what “end of life” really means, emphasizing the need for clear language in this debate.
Véronique Bourgninaud shared her personal experiences with disability and fragility, warning that legalizing euthanasia could create pressure on vulnerable individuals to end their lives. She expressed concern that society might begin to view those who are weak or dependent as less worthy of life.
However, some lawmakers and euthanasia advocates dismissed these concerns. They argued that examples from countries like Belgium, the Netherlands, and Canada did not reflect the potential risks of such laws. Many believe that the push for these laws is more about ideology and economic considerations rather than addressing the real suffering people experience at the end of life. Critics like Jean-Marie Le Méné warned that while palliative care is expensive and may only be available to the wealthy, euthanasia may become the option for those who cannot afford it.
This article has been translated and simplified by artificial intelligence from a French article “Fin de vie : « Vous n’allez pas d’abord légiférer sur une certaine idée de la liberté ou de la fraternité, mais sur des personnes, des personnes bien vivantes ! »”
.